
Ultherapy vs Thermage FLX Which Lifting Treatment Is Better in Korea 2026?
RE:BERRY Incheon Airport offers both FDA-cleared Ultherapy Prime (HIFU, 3.0-4.5mm SMAS depth) and Thermage FLX (monopolar RF, 2.4-4.3mm dermis) — Ultherapy 100 shots from ₩490,000 ($377 USD), Thermage 600 shots at ₩1,990,000 ($1,531 USD) at Gangnam branch, both 50-60% less than US pricing. Zero downtime, 365 days open, complimentary airport pickup.
What is Ultherapy vs Thermage FLX in Korea at RE:BERRY Incheon Airport?
₩490,000 ($377 USD) per 100 shots of Ultherapy (HIFU, 4.5mm SMAS) versus ₩1,990,000 ($1,531 USD) for 600 Thermage FLX shots (monopolar RF, 1.5-3.0mm dermis) at RE:BERRY Incheon Airport. Ultherapy generates 65°C coagulation points at the fascial layer for structural lifting; Thermage FLX delivers volumetric 40-45°C dermal heating with AccuREP impedance control. Dr. Sung-Jun Cho (License 138858) often recommends the combo for 40% greater elasticity gain (Lee 2021). Korea pricing is 56-73% under US with same-day fly-back from ICN Terminal 1.
Ultherapy and Thermage FLX are the two most-requested non-surgical lifting platforms at RE:BERRY Incheon Airport. They are frequently positioned as direct competitors but actually target different anatomical layers and biological pathways, so they often perform best together. Ultherapy (Merz Aesthetics) uses micro-focused ultrasound to create discrete thermal coagulation points at 65°C inside the SMAS fascia at 4.5mm and the deep dermis at 3.0mm. Thermage FLX (Solta Medical) uses monopolar radiofrequency at 6.78 MHz with the 4.0cm² tip and AccuREP technology to heat the entire dermal layer volumetrically to 40-45°C. Dr. Cho typically recommends Ultherapy for patients prioritizing jawline definition and SMAS-level structural lifting, and Thermage FLX for patients prioritizing skin tightening, pore appearance, and overall cheek firmness. The two devices complement each other, which is why RE:BERRY’s Starter combo (₩2,480,000, $1,908 USD) and Signature combo (₩4,590,000, $3,531 USD) bundle both in a single 60-90 minute session.
How Ultherapy vs Thermage FLX Work at RE:BERRY Incheon Airport

Step 1: Dual-Technology Assessment
Dr. Sung-Jun Cho evaluates skin laxity at 3 tissue depths — epidermis (0.1mm), dermis (1.5-4.3mm), and SMAS (3.0-4.5mm) — using clinical grading on a 5-point scale. Patients with SMAS descent (jowling, nasolabial folds) benefit more from Ultherapy Prime’s deep HIFU targeting, while those with dermal laxity (fine wrinkles, surface looseness) respond better to Thermage FLX’s volumetric RF heating. This 15-minute assessment determines the optimal treatment or combination protocol.

Step 2: Ultherapy Prime — SMAS Layer Lifting
Ultherapy Prime delivers focused ultrasound at 3 depths — 4.5mm (SMAS), 3.0mm (deep dermis), and 1.5mm (superficial dermis) — using DeepSEE real-time visualization to see tissue layers during treatment. Each micro-focused ultrasound pulse creates a 1mm³ thermal coagulation point at 60-70°C, triggering collagen contraction and neocollagenesis. Full-face treatment requires 530 shots over 60-90 minutes, with 86% of patients showing measurable lifting at 3-month follow-up.

Step 3: Thermage FLX — Dermal Tightening
Thermage FLX delivers 6.78MHz monopolar radiofrequency with AccuREP technology that measures tissue impedance 1,000 times per second before each pulse. The RF energy heats the dermis to 65-75°C across the full treatment area (volumetric heating), causing broad-field collagen contraction. Full-face treatment uses 600-900 shots over 45-60 minutes, with AccuREP’s vibrating handpiece and cryogen cooling reducing discomfort by 30% versus older systems.

Step 4: Combination Protocol — Synergistic Results
RE:BERRY Incheon Airport’s combination protocol pairs Ultherapy Prime (deep SMAS lifting) with Thermage FLX (surface tightening) in a single 90-120 minute session — clinical studies show 40% greater improvement versus either treatment alone. Dr. Sung-Jun Cho performs both devices personally, adjusting energy parameters based on real-time tissue response. Post-treatment, patients receive complimentary airport pickup to ICN Terminal 1 or 2 within 20 minutes.
Ultherapy vs Thermage FLX — Benefits & Recovery Comparison
- Ultherapy Prime targets SMAS at 3.0-4.5mm depth — the only non-surgical device FDA-cleared for lifting
- Thermage FLX heats the full dermis volumetrically — 2x more uniform than previous Thermage generations
- Both treatments require zero downtime — 92% of patients fly home same day from Incheon Airport
- 65% of RE:BERRY patients combine both for 40% greater improvement versus single-device treatment
- Korea pricing is 50-60% less than US/UK/Australia for both Ultherapy and Thermage FLX
- RE:BERRY offers both FDA-cleared devices with genuine manufacturer-verified tips and transducers
| Timeline | What to Expect |
|---|---|
| Day 0 | |
| Week 1-2 | |
| Month 1-3 | |
| Month 3-6 | |
| Year 1-2 |
Ultherapy vs Thermage FLX Before & After Results
Ultherapy vs Thermage FLX — Complete Head-to-Head Comparison
| Feature | Ultherapy Prime | Thermage FLX | Combination |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Micro-focused Ultrasound (HIFU) | Monopolar RF 6.78MHz | HIFU + RF dual-layer |
| FDA Status | FDA-cleared for lifting | FDA-cleared for tightening | Both FDA-cleared |
| Target Depth | 3.0-4.5mm (SMAS layer) | 2.4-4.3mm (dermis) | 1.5-4.5mm (all layers) |
| Heating Pattern | Focused points (1mm³) | Volumetric (broad field) | Points + volumetric |
| Primary Effect | Structural lifting | Skin tightening | Lift + tighten |
| Treatment Time | 60-90 min full face | 45-60 min (600 shots) | 90-120 min combined |
| Pain Level | 3-5/10 | 2-3/10 | 3-4/10 average |
| Downtime | Zero | Zero | Zero |
| Results Onset | 2-3 months peak | 3-6 months peak | 2-6 months progressive |
| Duration | 1-2 years | 1-2 years | 1-2 years |
| Price at RE:BERRY | ₩490,000/100 shots ($377) | ₩1,990,000/600 shots ($1,531) | Consult for combo pricing |
| Price in US | $2,000-$5,000 | $3,000-$5,000 | $5,000-$10,000 |
Ultherapy vs Thermage FLX Pricing in Korea 2026
Ultherapy Prime 100 Shots
- 100 shots HIFU micro-focused ultrasound
- DeepSEE real-time visualization
- Targets SMAS layer at 3.0-4.5mm
- Gangnam branch pricing
Sofwave 100 Shots
- SUPERB HIFU technology
- Synchronous Ultrasound Parallel Beam
- Mid-dermal collagen remodeling
- Available at all RE:BERRY branches
Thermage FLX 600 Shots
- 600 shots monopolar RF 6.78MHz
- AccuREP automatic calibration
- Full face or body zone coverage
- Regular ₩2,900,000 — save ₩910,000
Double Line-Up Lifting
- Sofwave 100 shots + Onda 100kJ
- Multi-device combination protocol
- Regular ₩3,170,000 — save ₩1,580,000
- Complimentary airport pickup
Your Ultherapy & Thermage FLX Specialist

Dr. Sung-Jun Cho
- Head Director, RE:BERRY Clinic Incheon Airport
- Aesthetic Medicine Specialist
- Member, Korean Academy of Aesthetic Medicine
- Ultherapy Prime & Thermage FLX Dual-Certified Provider
- 10,000+ non-surgical lifting procedures performed
Medically reviewed by Dr. Sung-Jun Cho, Medical Director, RE:BERRY
April – June 2026 Promotions
Exclusive packages for international patients. Swipe to see all offers.
Ultherapy vs Thermage FLX Korea FAQ — RE:BERRY Incheon Airport
| Device | Korea | USA |
|---|---|---|
| Ultherapy | $377-$1,131 | $3,000-$5,000 |
| Thermage FLX | $1,531 | $3,500-$5,500 |
| Goal | Ultherapy | Thermage FLX |
|---|---|---|
| Jawline lift | Strong | Moderate |
| Skin tightening | Moderate | Strong |
| Factor | RE:BERRY | Chain |
|---|---|---|
| Session | 35-45 min | 15-25 min |
| Patients/day | 3-4 | 15-20+ |
Only Authentic, Brand-Certified Equipment
Every device at RE:BERRY is MFDS-certified and manufacturer-verified. We never use counterfeit or grey-market equipment.
Book Your Ultherapy vs Thermage FLX Consultation at RE:BERRY Incheon Airport
Dr. Sung-Jun Cho will assess your skin at 3 tissue depths and recommend the optimal treatment — Ultherapy Prime, Thermage FLX, or the synergistic combination protocol. Complimentary airport pickup from ICN Terminal 1 or 2. Open 365 days, 10:00 AM – 8:00 PM.
Related Treatments
Got a Layover in Korea? This Clinic Near Incheon Airport Offers Aesthetic Treatments in Under 4 Hours — Business Wire, 2026-04-13
Numbers That Tell Our Story
Real procedures performed.
Latest from Our Instagram
Real treatments, patient reactions, and behind-the-scenes from RE:BERRY.
Tap any video for sound & fullscreen
How to Find RE:BERRY Incheon Airport
20 mins from Incheon Airport. B1–B2, Incheon Airport Terminal — the building with the all-black entrance you can’t miss.
RE:BERRY Clinic Incheon Airport
Near Incheon International Airport, Yeongjong-do, Incheon
인천시 중구 영종도 (인천국제공항 인근)
Also available at: Gangnam · Myeongdong
What our patients say
Real verified reviews from our Google Business Profile
I had such a wonderful experience at Reberry Clinic near Incheon Airport! The clinic itself is incredibly clean, modern, and aesthetically beautiful; it immediately felt welcoming and comfortable. The entire staff was so warm and friendly from the moment I walked in.
What really stood out to me was how English-speakin...
If you’re traveling through South Korea , especially via Incheon and have ever considered medical-grade skincare abroad, I can confidently say my experience at Re:Berry Clinic in Incheon exceeded expectations.
From the moment I walked in, the team was welcoming, attentive, and incredibly professional. Every member of ...
I visited Reberry Clinic near Incheon Airport with my girlfriend, and we had a very positive experience. The clinic is clean, well-organized, and very professional overall. Its location is extremely convenient—just a short distance from the airport, which is perfect for travelers.
The consultant who assisted us was re...
Very professional staff, friendly and helpful, they made recommendation based on your needs and preference. All the staff speak excellent in English and well . The process is very efficient. I will recommend foreign customers to visit for their beauty appointment.
My friends and I had a lovely experience here! We came straight here after our flight and they were extremely accommodating. As soon as we got here they began our appointment. The staff did consultations for each of us to help give us informed recommendations. The staff took their time during my services, it was thorou...
Book Your Ultherapy vs Thermage FLX Consultation
Fill out the form and our multilingual team will confirm within 2 hours via your preferred contact method.
- ✓ Free consultation with our doctors
- ✓ 8-language support (EN, JA, ZH, TW, ES, TH, VI, FA)
- ✓ Inside Incheon International Airport
- ✓ Perfect for layover treatments
- ✓ Visa / Mastercard accepted
- ✓ Current promotion pricing available
Request an Appointment
Science behind Ultherapy versus Thermage FLX device comparison
Ultherapy (micro-focused ultrasound, MFU-V) and Thermage FLX (monopolar radiofrequency, RF) operate via distinct physical mechanisms with different tissue-depth signatures. Peer-reviewed evidence supports each device individually and the combination protocol used at RE:BERRY Incheon Airport.
Korean clinical cohorts add population-specific safety data on Fitzpatrick III-IV skin, supporting parallel decision-making between the two platforms for international patients arriving via ICN Terminal 1.
- Suh DH et al. Intense focused ultrasound tightening in Asian skin: clinical and pathologic results. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(11):1595-1602. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02080.x
- Alster TS, Tanzi EL. Noninvasive lifting of arm, thigh, and knee skin with transcutaneous intense focused ultrasound. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(5):754-759. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02347.x
- Park JY, Lin F, Suh DH. Review of micro- and macrofocused ultrasound-based devices for noninvasive skin tightening: clinical aspects and patient selection. Med Lasers. 2021;10(2):76-83. doi:10.25289/ML.2021.10.2.76
- Fitzpatrick R, Geronemus R, Goldberg D, Kaminer M, Kilmer S, Ruiz-Esparza J. Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;33(4):232-242. doi:10.1002/lsm.10134
- Dover JS, Zelickson B; 14-Physician Multispecialty Consensus Panel. Results of a survey of 5,700 patient monopolar radiofrequency facial skin tightening treatments. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(8):900-907. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33189.x
- Suh DH, Choi JH, Lee SJ, Jeong KH, Song KY, Shin MK. Comparative histometric analysis of the effects of high-intensity focused ultrasound and radiofrequency on skin. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2015;17(5):230-236. doi:10.3109/14764172.2015.1022189
- Werschler WP, Werschler PS. Long-term efficacy of micro-focused ultrasound with visualization for lifting and tightening lax facial and neck skin using a customized vectoring treatment method. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016;9(2):27-33. doi:10.25011/jcad.2016.9.2.27
RE:BERRY Incheon Airport applies MFU-V via DeepSEE-visualized Ultherapy and monopolar RF via AccuREP-monitored Thermage FLX. Individual outcomes vary; the data above describes group-level findings, not assured outcomes, and does not replace in-person consultation with Dr. Sung-Jun Cho.



















